HitBTC Appears Insolvent [Blockchain Analysis]
This research effort was prompted by information presented to Zerononcense from a member of the cryptocurrency community.
Specifically, this individual reached out with relevant information about HitBTC’s potential insolvency and inability to fulfill customer withdrawal requests (in crypto).
After receiving this information and some corroborating screenshots, the author decided to delve a bit deeper.
The first, and most readily apparent evidence that there has been ongoing trouble with the HitBTC exchange can be found through public complaints by customers.
Below are some screenshots from the HitBTC Telegram:
Below are some screenshots from Reddit:
HitBTC’s Reddit is No Longer in Existence
Notably, HitBTC’s Reddit can no longer be found on the website.
When attempting to access it, this page is displayed:
Even well-known Core developer, Luke Dash Jr. had some issues with HitBTC:
Eventually, however, it appears that HitBTC did get around to allowing Luke Dash Jr. to access his funds:
It is worth questioning whether this process was expedited solely due to Luke’s influence and popularity in the crypto community as a long time Core developer. Obviously, his issues received significantly more attention than that of other individuals that have had similar problems with HitBTC.
Here are some other complaints about HitBTC:
Safe to Say There are Some Withdrawal Issues
After reviewing the scores of reports on various different platforms that attest to customers having a generally difficult time withdrawing their funds from HitBTC, if at all, it seems obvious that HitBTC is having significant issues on their end.
There are dozens of reports from customers regarding withdrawal issues that are not included in the screenshots above. Most of these reports note that they have been waiting for their withdrawals for a significant period of time.
What is particularly troubling is that these are crypto withdrawals that these customers are waiting for, rather than fiat. This is notable because, with fiat withdrawal requests, there is at least a possibility that there is an issue outside of the exchange’s control (i.e., banks, regulations, disputes with payment processors, legal proceedings, etc.) that could be creating the backlog.
However, in this case, the issue is that customers are not receiving crypto withdrawals, which is usually a major signal that an exchange is in serious trouble.
Given this fact, the next reasonable course of action is to review HitBTC’s funds in order to confirm this hypothesis and get a better idea of what’s going on.
Crystal Blockchain Overview
For this portion of the review, Crystal Blockchain Software will be utilized to get a better overview of what is going on at HitBTC.
Specifically, we’re going to start by taking a look at HitBTC’s Bitcoin funds:
The picture above shows the inflow/outflow of Bitcoin for HitBTC.
It is important to note that the data above contains information about all addresses that are associated directly with HitBTC.
This includes all deposit addresses, cold & hot wallet addresses too. These are paired together via the clustering mechanism that you’ll find on walletexplorer.com.
Since the software that is being used in this report (Crystal Blockchain) is not publicly accessible, ‘WalletExplorer’ is the best choice to look at HitBTC’s cluster.
Link to all addresses in HitBTC’s cluster: https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/HitBtc.com/addresses
Link to transactions in the [new] HitBTC cluster: https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/HitBtc.com
Link to transactions in the [old] HitBTC cluster: https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/HitBtc.com-old
Users should note that most of the time, the website WalletExplorer will cluster the cold wallet in a separate cluster address.
Fortunately, Crystal does not do this. However, in this case, this is not what WalletExplorer did, so we are good to go.
Explanation For the Picture Itself
Obviously, what is most notable in the graphics above is that 99.8% of the funds went to a category titled, ‘Not defined’ by the software.
Even more interesting is the breakdown of funds flowing into the exchange.
As one can observe above, there is a category for ‘gambling’, which accounts for 39.9% of the inflow into HitBTC’s wallet.
By isolating this category, we can observe who the primary senders are. They are pictured below:
As noted in the screenshot above, there are a significant number of gambling outfits that have sent funds directly to HitBTC.
In the picture above, a box was placed around ‘Coingaming.io’, because we can see that they have sent a remarkable 288k bitcions from 2014 to present day (literally).
This represents 41% of all coins that have been sent out from Coingaming.io (which has sent a whopping 690k bitcoins in total). This number also represents 40% of the total inflow of Bitcoin that HitBTC has received as well.
Brief Background On Coingaming.io
Coingaming.io is owned by ‘The Coingaming Group’.
Specifically, ‘The Coingaming Group’ is attached to bitcasino.io and sportsbet.io
The address that Coingaming.io has listed is:
mBet Solution N.V.
This address was located in the ‘Offshore Leaks Database’:
Two listed officers for the related address are:
- Antonius Andrianus Simonis
- Vivian V. Ersilia
Specifically, Antonius Simonis is attached to ‘CMS Management Ltd.’, which Vivian V. Ersilia is also attached to. They are both directors of this company.
As we expand the nodes, we start to find more interesting connections:
There is much to be said about the fact that these connections lead us back (almost directly) to Panama — which has been a hub for a significant amount of crime (gambling-related, in specific).
In addition, two of the casinos underneath ‘The Coingaming Group’, bitcasino.io and sportsbet.io, have been outed numerous times in media online for defrauding users.
Sportsbet + Bitcasino scam get your losses back for past 5 years
_Did you ever dream about loss back? We think it is time to let your dream come true for the illegal Bitcasino scam and…_game-protect.com
Thus, the funds that are being sent from ‘Coingaming Group’ should be held in question. Significantly so.
Origin of Funds is Questionable
While it is possible that all of the funds that have entered into the address (apart Coingaming.io) derive from legitimate customer deposits to the exchange, this should also be scrutinized and questioned.
Specifically, Coingaming.io warrants question not only for the reasons presented above, but also because of their reception of fraudulent funds in other notable hacks.
Crystal Blockchain Analytics: Investigation of the Bithumb Exchange Hack
_In this report, Bitfury shares analysis completed by its Crystal Blockchain Analytics team on the Bithumb exchange…_medium.com
In both of the aforementioned hacks, funds eventually landed at Coingaming.io for some reason.
Examining the Outflow of Funds
We’ll begin by examining the first entity on the list, which is a cluster address that has received 488k bitcoins.
Examining the First Cluster Address Source
The walletexplorer address for this cluster = https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/457b8ced800ee788
Address balances can be found here: https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/457b8ced800ee788/addresses
Below are the metrics for this cluster:
This cluster only contains 5 addresses, which are:
Thus, it could be posited that perhaps these were the cold wallet addresses for HitBTC (even though this has not been validated publicly).
When looking online, there are some interesting tidbits in relation to the first address on our list, such as the ones presented below:
Obviously, this isn’t a confirmed report, but there are some other ‘interesting’ reports about the addresses connected here, to say the least.
Inflow of Funds Reveals Potential HitBTC Ownership of HitBTC
This heading may be considered controversial to some, but it is a fairly supported conclusion when analzying the inflow of funds into our second cluster address.
Let’s check out a picture below:
Let’s quickly summarize the wallet addresses that have sent funds to this second HitBTC wallet address.
- Changelly — Unfortunately, there isn’t much that we’ll be able to extract from this one because Changelly is a wallet swap service similar to ShapeShift. So there is no telling where these funds came from.
- HitBTC — The transaction with an orange box around it also stems from HitBTC. For whatever reason, HitBTC sent significant funds to another address before sending them here.
- Freewallet — This is a troubling connection because there is wealth of evidence to suggest that Freewallet was and is a fraudulent company that has stolen funds from customers.
- Coingaming.io — Again, we have another connection from Coingaming.io (whom sent the funds directly to the connected address before they were deposited into this final liquidation cluster for HitBTC).
Ownership of This Cluster
This is a cluster address that is clearly linked to HitBTC. However, there are no customers that were sending funds into this address — this is not attached to the HitBTC exchange directly.
Whatever source owns this address also has a significant stake in Coingaming.io. This entity must also be attached to the ‘Freewallet’ scam as well.
Notably, this was found online with regards to ‘Freewallet’:
Outflow of Bitcoin Funds
Below, we can see the outflow of funds from the second cluster (where all of HitBTC’s bitcoin was sent):
As we can see in the figure above, funds went to:
Remaining Bitcoin Funds for HitBTC
- Cluster Address #1 (Main Cluster) = 191.60 bitcoins
- Cluster Address #2 = 166.3977 bitcoins
- Cluster Address #3 = 0 bitcoins (received 110k bitcoins from HitBTC; didn’t receive any after June 22nd, 2018)
The remaining clusters that received funds are empty.
In total, unless there is some other source of funds for HitBTC that is not present and obvious to the general public, they only have 356 bitcoins remaining.
The USD value (at the time of writing) of these holdings is about $2.56 million.
Follow-up research will be done to evaluate the remainder of HitBTC’s reserves.